In the development of a treatise on modern just governance, a secondary project of mine will be to develop an outline for a new party platform for free minded Americans. This platform will be supportive of treatise theories on preferred methods of governance and of the United States Constitution.
The difference between the treatise and the party platform is essentially the definition of universal truths, vs. the application of principals to the political framework of the United State’s Republic. The treatise will evolve from the political theory of the ages. The party platform will declare and determine a means of bringing about change in the US specifically.
In response to our new reality, I have decided to change my goals for this blog. In the past I had a delusion of grandeur that I could somehow become the next Michelle Malkin. That is not in the cards for me. I am disgusted with politicians. I cannot stomach their constant pandering, or the commentary that repetitively digests tripe like cows passing food through different stomachs. I have a new delusion. I hope to develop a treatise on modern American politics and government. So many complain about the policies presented. So few develop policies considering the consequences that every change will make. It is my goal to develop a new definition of “just” government for America. It is then my intent to describe a path from our current circumstance to this goal. That will be the purpose of this blog. It is not my intent to discuss current events and policies other than to use them as examples of just and unjust government. Whether this experiment garners any web traffic is doubtful, but this is a path to which I have felt called. I hope to be up to the task, as I feel deeply that this errand must be completed.
It’s been over a year since I have posted to this website. Over the last year it has become ever more apparent that the progressives in our nation have a far-stronger foothold than we ever could have imagined. It has become apparent that the Republican party is now too far gone to save. The primary goal of that old party is to rule, not to lead. Local governance is not represented in any branch of the federal government including the courts. We are now facing the kind of revolution and reformation that faced Rome so long ago. It is our choice how we will reform this nation and save freedom for our posterity. There is no saving the Republic exactly as it has stood in it’s glorious past. The best we can do to honor the history and sacrifice of our nation is to rebuild, from the ground up, a State that honors freedom for all. This movement will face opposition from what has become the majority of Americans. It is the sad reality of our times that the majority cherishes their safety net and mediocrity more than they cherish their right to better themselves and their posterity’s standing. This movement will also face opposition from those who would rule over and control others within the conservative movement. It may anger those with a true “Libertarian” viewpoint as it will recognize the right of people to control those within their local community. This path, which I will refer to as the Free Americans movement, will start at the beginning, where the progressives did, at education. The Free Americans movement is not just a title, it is a verb. The goal is to Free Americans from their progressive chains, to awaken the individualism and desire to build that is the American heritage. This movement will, some day, result in the construction of a nation that inspires the world, but does not rely on it. A country that leads in innovation, prosperity, and celebrates the potential of each individual. This will be our new Independent Republic.
And what manner of government do you term oligarchy?
A government resting on a valuation of property, in which the rich have power and the poor man is deprived of it.
And then one, seeing another grow rich, seeks to rival him, and thus the great mass of the citizens become lovers of money.
the rulers, being aware that their power rests upon their wealth, refuse to curtail by law the extravagance of the spendthrift youth because they gain by their ruin; they take interest from them and buy up their estates and thus increase their own wealth
This topic has become incredibly difficult for public discussion as both sides have been whipped into a frenzy and see the other side as either destroying the economy or wanting to tear their families apart. This is not a good environment to have a constructive debate. The debate has just become more and more destructive.
The fact of the matter is that it is solely the job of the federal government to deal with the issue, but the current administration had publicly denied that responsibility and will not do their job. I understand why many states are moving to enforce the federal laws themselves, because their enforcement is vital for the security of our country and the stability of our economy. The federal government also needs to deal with the demand for legal entry to the US. The majority of immigrants would much rather enter the US legally as it would reduce a lot of stress and complications they face. Our legal immigration process is completely broken and must be fixed FIRST before we start on other solutions. When the demand for immigration is met fairly and reasonably, we can then secure our borders with Mexico and Canada. We can then begin enforcing our current laws (which are more than adequate to handle the issue). Enforcing our laws before the legal immigration issue has been handled will only inspire a greater feeling of oppression among illegal immigrants who see no other option but to break our laws. This will make them even more mistrusting of our legitimate immigration policies and systems.
A hard line must be drawn in enforcing the immigration issue. However, to put enforcement in a preferential position to dealing with the problem that exists right now is to put an ideal before reality. We must deal with what is, not what we think should be. These people need to work and we need them here, but forcing them into an illegal underground system where they are unable to participate civilly is unreasonable. They should be able to pay a fine or receive a reasonable sentence for their crime and then be allowed to contribute to our society legitimately. The idea of busing them all back across the border, or forcing them all to go back home sounds good to many, but it is an absurd notion and will not work in reality. This problem is here to stay if we do not solve it with reason.
I can’t believe it, but we have almost survived the first (and only) term of Barack Obama’s presidency. Under his direction we have seen corruption and failure it would have been hard to imagine 10 years ago. He is still blaming Bush for everything, and while he is right that Bush started this recession, he has done nothing but make it worse. So today we look forward to what the Republicans can offer in 2012. Sadly, there isn’t much to be enthusiastic about here either.
First lets consider the two media-dubbed “front runners”, Mitt Romney and Rick Perry. Both of these men are your business-as-usual politician. Perry is pandering heavily for tea party votes, but for the most part we see right through him. Romney is a nice guy, and would have made an excellent president back in the late ’90s political environment. Unfortunately, we face a far more hostile and critical situation today, which I do not think he understands. He would make an acceptable president if he wins. Perry doesn’t seem to be trustworthy to me, he seems to be all talk and no substance. He does not seem to fully understand the tea party positions he promotes. He cannot explain why small government is better and consistently falls into the media’s trappings where they make him seem like a fool. Continue reading →
It has been ten years since the twin towers fell, and our future changed. The end of decadence and unbridled ambition. We now find ourselves in a very similar position to that of the late 1920s.
Ten years ago I was a scared high-school senior, watching evil at work in my country. I remember the feeling of dread I felt and the tense recognition my teachers had as they realized my generation would not be without its own bloody fight for freedom. I remember patriotic school assemblies and American spirit. I saw my friends join the military, and later, my family members become Marines. I have seen them go to war. I have read about others who never came home. The fight is not over, but is merely changing direction. Terrorism will likely never go away, but it has inspired chaos around the world.
I would like to commend those who designed and built the 9/11 memorial. It is beautiful and a wonderful place to remember. I wish things had been done differently, but it is good to see the skyline rising from the ashes. If not freedom tower, maybe they should call it phoenix plaza. At least that has a nice connotation.
For those that died on 9/11 I have no words, for the firefighters and first responders, I would like to say thank you, but I don’t think that quite covers it. The best I can offer is to say: I will NEVER forget what happened that morning.
In 1776, our founding fathers set out to construct a new system of government, one in which all power would be given by the very same people it was designed to govern. This new government would be forged from the successes and strengthened against the failures of the great historical civilizations while embracing the new thoughts and ideas of the enlightenment period. These new ideas centered on a common experience of the American pilgrims: that men could rule themselves better than any king or legislature. This great “American Experiment” soon changed and inspired the rest of the world, but it has always had its critics. At the time of the revolution, there were those who were loyal to the British Crown, later, some sought a constitutional monarchy, and today there is growing support for a more European style social democracy.
In contrast to these views, our federal republic was formed to keep society’s power where it is most easily managed by its citizens, with limited central control, and vast diversity and activity at the local level. Over our nation’s history there has been a migration of power to the national level, where it is more easily manipulated by politicians and lobbyists, and is out of reach for the common citizen. As this process has continued, American government has grown inefficient in addressing the needs of its citizens and clumsy in the implementation of regulation. This has caused many to become disenfranchised with our republic and look for ways to fundamentally transform our system of government. What these individuals fail to realize is that the reason our republic functions so poorly is because it has been operating in a manner wholly inconsistent with its original design. If this republic is to be restored to a proper order and balance, it will require a more comprehensive education and involvement amongst its citizens at the local level and a restoration to its original purpose and design at the national level. Continue reading →
While I agree with Mr. Gingrich in part, I believe that this focus is misplaced. There will always be an outlet for leaked information. Whether online or in The Enquirer, leaks will be published and I don’t believe that particular act should be criminalised. However, consequenses for the source should be swift, public, and final. We have grown to soft in our modern society. This weakness in action to defend ourselves has removed the seriousness that these situations require. It should strike fear to the heart of any individual who entertains the thought of betraying the society in which they live. Treason is more serious than murder . Continue reading →